On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Frankly, I'm not sure we bet on the right horse in not mandating a
> version numbering scheme from the beginning. But given that we
> didn't, we probably don't want to get too forceful about it too
> quickly. However, we could ease into it by documenting a recommended
> numbering scheme and making features like version-dependencies work
> only when that scheme is used.
PGXN mandates semantic versions for this reason (currently v1.0.0):
http://semver.org/spec/v1.0.0.html
Removes all the ambiguity.
David