Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 979.1476802684@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 18 October 2016 at 04:19, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> On 2016-10-17 16:16:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I wouldn't think that cross-file references would be especially
>>> common. Functions that take PG_FUNCTION_ARGS and return Datum aren't
>>> a lot of fun to call from C. But maybe I'm wrong.
>> There's a fair number of DirectFunctionCall$Ns over the backend.
> It's only an issue if one contrib calls another contrib (or the core
> backend code calls into a contrib, but that's unlikely) via
> DirectFunctionCall .
No, it's cross *file* references within a single contrib module that
would be likely to need extern declarations in a header file. That's
not especially weird IMO. I'm not sure how many cases there actually
are though.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: