Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Perhaps I'm asking a naive question, but wouldn't it be easier if
> people had the opportunity to use the buildfarm without actually
> committing something?
Why? The whole point of the buildfarm is to break, as it were.
I don't see the value of adding more bureaucracy in order to keep
it from breaking.
regards, tom lane