Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9760.1032838513@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I was thinking 'transaction_timestamp' for the transaction start time, and
> current_timestamp for the statement start time. I would equate now()
> with current_timestamp.
So you want to both (a) invent even more nonstandard syntax than we
already have, and (b) break as many traditional-Postgres applications
as you possibly can?
'transaction_timestamp' has no reason to live. It's not in the spec.
And AFAIK the behavior of now() has been well-defined since the
beginning of Postgres. If you want to change 'current_timestamp' to
conform to a rather debatable reading of the spec, then fine --- but
keep your hands off of now().
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: