Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Hiroshi neglected to mention that you'd probably need to drop and
>> recreate the index after applying the patch; if it's indeed out of
>> order, just patching the comparator bug isn't enough to fix it.

> Does Hiroshi's patch get applied?

Now that I understand the problem, yes, his patch is good as far as
it goes.  There are probably other places with the same problem...

            regards, tom lane