Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types.

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Seems this will have to wait for 7.3.

> Why?

Because Paul's not yet responded to my gripes of (now) 10 days ago.
The patch as given reverts the I/O behavior of the inet datatypes
to what it originally was, rather than the compromise behavior that
was hammered out at great length before 7.1.  (I'd give a link to
those discussions if fts.postgresql.org were working :-()

> and, to be a bit more riendly to those of us stuck on 56k lines, could you
> avoid re-sending, repeatedly, large patch files?

I agree on that one ...

            regards, tom lane