Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9717.1255979114@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Oct 19, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 2. Also invent a #option syntax that allows the GUC to be overridden
>> per-function. (Since the main GUC is SUSET, we can't just use a
>> per-function SET to override it. There are other ways we could do
>> this but none seem less ugly than #option...)
> What about adopting the modifier syntax you're adding to COPY?
Where exactly would you put the modifier, and why is that better than
the existing #option convention?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: