Re: TOAST versus toast
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TOAST versus toast |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 96f62e7c-c3a2-41d9-9d13-5bda416475a5@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: TOAST versus toast
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16.01.25 06:38, Peter Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 3:26 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> writes: >>> During some recent reviews, I came across some comments mentioning "toast" ... >>> TOAST is a PostgreSQL acronym for "The Oversized-Attribute Storage >>> Technique" [1]. >> >> It is indeed an acronym, but usages such as "toasting" are all over >> our code and docs, as you see. I question whether changing that >> to "TOASTing" improves readability. I agree that consistently >> saying "TOAST table" not "toast table" is a good idea, but I'm >> not quite convinced that removing every last lower-case occurrence >> is a win, especially in these combined forms. >> > > Hi, thanks for the reply. > > How about I reduce the scope by only tackling the uncontroversial > stuff, and leave all those "combined forms" for another day? > > Attached is the reduced patch for changes to the documentation. committed
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: