On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 08:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> One thing I am wondering is if we should have a dummy_table_am in
> src/test/modules/ to be able to stress more this feature. That does
> not seem like a hard requirement, but relying only on heap limits a
> bit the coverage of this feature even if one changes
> default_table_access_method.
I agree that a dummy AM would be good, but implementing even a dummy AM
is a fair amount of work. Also, there are many potential variations, so
we'd probably need several.
The table AM API is a work in progress, and I think it will be a few
releases (and require a few more table AMs in the wild) to really nail
down the API.
Regards,
Jeff Davis