Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 11/15/15 9:50 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> I'd prefer to omit fields if explicitly assigned to NULL. You can always
>> use coalesce if you want the string 'NULL'; I agree with others here
>> that the vast majority of users will want the field just omitted.

> I think the problem was that you can't omit the primary message.

If you ask me, that would be a feature not a bug.
        regards, tom lane