Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id 966.1265222642@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> FWIW I think there's another problem with streaming replication here,
> which is that most data flows from client to server, so it would take
> quite some time for the threshold to be reached.  Note that there's no
> size check in the libpq frontend code.  Normally this is not an issue
> because the bulk of data is expected to flow in the other direction.

Huh?  I thought the slaves connect to the master, rather than the other
way round?

It's true that libpq doesn't contain any such code, but that seems like
a fortunate thing right at the moment, as it limits the number of places
we might have to hack something.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alex Hunsaker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]
Следующее
От: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings