Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Дата
Msg-id 9639.997971620@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Список pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> We aren't.  I can do that, but have not discussed it yet.  If we do it
> is clearly a protocol change.  How will old clients handle longer salt,
> and how do I know if they are older if I don't bump up the protocol
> version number?

All of this is under the aegis of a new auth method code, so it doesn't
matter.  Either clients handle the new auth method, or they don't.

The problem with bumping the protocol version number is that it breaks
client-to-server compatibility *whether or not a particular connection
needs the new auth method*.  Eg, a new client will be unable to talk to
an old server.  This is not good.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords