Re: [HACKERS] FATAL 1:btree: items are out of order

On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
...
> > > Please try new nbtcompare.c, which follows (sorry).
> > >
> > Do you want me to USE_LOCALE for the test?
>
> No! It's fixed for non-USE_LOCALE. Just re-compile with
> new nbtcompare.c...
> (With USE_LOCALE all should be Ok too.)

Ok, I tried.

One time it worked,
three times it failed.

Same definition, same data, same programs.

hopp=> copy h from '/a/hopp/export/h.dmp';
FATAL 1:btree: items are out of order (leftmost 0, stack 59, update 2)

hopp=> copy h from '/a/hopp/export/h.dmp';
FATAL 1:btree: items are out of order (leftmost 0, stack 68, update 2)

hopp=> copy h from '/a/hopp/export/h.dmp~';
FATAL 1:btree: items are out of order (leftmost 0, stack 29, update 2)

If I look onto the datafile-size then it seems to break on different places.

Sorry,


Bye!
- ----
Michael Reifenberger
Plaut Software GmbH, R/3 Basis

------------------------------