Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Дата
Msg-id 958.1521730623@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> how about letting the line go long, with the comment at the right of
> each definition, with one blank line between struct members, as in the
> sample below?

>     NameData    proname;        /* procedure name */

>     Oid         pronamespace BKI_DEFAULT(PGNSP); /* OID of namespace containing this proc */

>     Oid         proowner BKI_DEFAULT(PGUID); /* procedure owner */

I don't think this is going to work: pgindent is going to wrap most of
these comments, ending up with something that's ugly *and* consumes
just as much vertical space as if we'd given the comments their own
lines.  The problem is that in the headers where we were using
same-line comments, the comments were written to fit in the space
available without this extra annotation.  (For my money, having spent
lots of time shaving a character or two off such comments to make 'em
fit, I'd much prefer the luxury of having a whole line to write in.)

We could go with some scheme that preserves the old formatting of the
struct definition proper and puts the added info somewhere else, ie

    Oid         pronamespace;  /* OID of namespace containing this proc */

    Oid         prolang;       /* OID of pg_language entry */

then after the struct:

BKI_DEFAULT(pronamespace, PGNSP);
BKI_DEFAULT(prolang, 12);

but on the whole I don't think that's an improvement.  I'd rather keep
the info about a field together.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Следующее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data