-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, October 20, 2006 19:11:33 -0400 Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
wrote:
> Marc,
>
>> But ... if he "re-submitted" the same article a second time, then most
>> likely it got rejected for exactly the right reason: it was a duplicate
>> posting. Why didn't you approve the one that actually *was* in the
>> moderation queue? :(
>
> Actually, that's a buggy filter. It really should not be filtering out
> "duplicate" messages with timestamps hours apart. The
> post-bounce-subscribe-repost cycle happens *all the time* and that filter
> makes a subscriber wait for me to get to them in the hold queue (which
> sometimes I don't, due to 100+ spams per list per day) even though they
> resoved the "problem" themselves.
>
> So please correct that filter so that it behaves intelligently. Thanks!
You are most welcome to modify the access_rules for those lists you moderate if
you feel they are broken ... there is no way for the system to know you
*didn't* approve what was in the moderation queue (it kinda assumes that, as
moderator, you approved any legit postings, not rejected them because the
poster wasn't subscribed) ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFOV7X4QvfyHIvDvMRAseFAKCrCycXgRt+1Wr+lojU88VK8m9clQCglSa8
3WBQGUZIkJ7NVzM1ofg+EHo=
=7caF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----