Re: libpq not reentrant

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That is entirely the wrong place to put it.  There is a section
>> specifically about libpq's reentrancy or lack of it; mention the
>> issue there.

> Uh, I put it in this section:

Um ... duh ... I can only plead momentary brain fade.  Yes, that
is the right section.

But I'd suggest moving it down a para or two, to put it next to the
para pointing out that PQoidStatus etc are not thread-safe.  That
was the context I was expecting to see.

Also, the "however" can be left out, and ditto "guarantted to be"
(which is mispelled anyway...)

            regards, tom lane