Leon <leon@udmnet.ru> writes:
> So I decided to simply forbid long operators to end with minus.
No good: we already have some. There are three standard geometric
operators named "?-" ... not to mention lord-knows-what user-defined
operators out in the field. This might have been a good solution if
we'd put it in on day one, but it's too late.
I still like just telling people to write "a > -2". They don't expect
"ab" to mean the same thing as "a b", nor "24" to be the same as "2 4",
so why should ">-" necessarily mean the same as "> -" ?
It would also be worth remembering that "-" is far from the only unary
operator name we have, and so a solution that creates special behavior
just for "-" is really no solution at all. Making a special case for
"-" just increases the potential for confusion, not decreases it, IMHO.
regards, tom lane