Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush()
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 945b985ae22bfe9e88be029a3f4efd13c918e708.camel@j-davis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush() (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 16:29 -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 11:38 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 4:16 AM Melanie Plageman > > <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Why is it okay for other processes than the startup process to > > > initialize LocalMinRecoveryPoint from ControlFile- > > > >minRecoveryPoint > > > during crash recovery? > > > > During crash recovery we don't yet know the minRecoveryPoint until > > we > > replay all the WALs and once it is done it will be updated in the > > ControlFile at PerformRecoveryXLogAction()- > > >CreateEndOfRecoveryRecord(). ... > > Though, it seems like LocalMinRecoveryPoint must be getting > incorrectly set elsewhere, otherwise this would have guarded us from > examining the control file: I am confused about whether we are discussing "incorrect" or "invalid". Regards, Jeff Davis > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: