On Oct 11, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi, Mark,
>
> Mark Woodward wrote:
>
>>> People are working it, someone even got so far as dealing with most
>>> catalog upgrades. The hard part going to be making sure that even if
>>> the power fails halfway through an upgrade that your data will
>>> still be
>>> readable...
>>
>> Well, I think that any *real* DBA understands and accepts that
>> issues like
>> power failure and hardware failure create situations where
>> "suboptimal"
>> conditions exist. :-) Stopping the database and copying the pg
>> directory
>> addresses this problem, upon failure, it is a simple mv bkdir
>> pgdir, gets
>> you started again.
>
> But when people have enough bandwith and disk space to copy the pg
> directory, they also have enough to create and store a bzip2
> compressed
> dump of the database.
>
> Or did I miss something?
Not necessarily. "copying" a directory on most modern unix systems
can be accomplished by snapshotting the filesystem. In this case,
you only pay the space and performance cost for blocks that are
changed between the time of the snap and the time it is discarded.
An actual copy of the database is often too large to juggle (which is
why we write stuff straight to tape libraries).
The real problem with a "dump" of the database is that you want to be
able to quickly switch back to a known working copy in the event of a
failure. A dump is the furthest possible thing from a working copy
as one has to rebuild the database (indexes, etc.) and in doing so,
you (1) spend the better part of a week running pg_restore and (2)
ANALYZE stats change, so your system's behavior changes in hard-to-
understand ways.
Best regards,
Theo
// Theo Schlossnagle
// CTO -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
// OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- http://www.omniti.com/