Re: libpq naming on Win64
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: libpq naming on Win64 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 937d27e11001070428o4ac42bf1lc1e9da56febd91f7@mail.gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: libpq naming on Win64 (Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp> wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp> wrote: >>> >>> Maybe I'm missing the point and have a question. >>> >>> For example, do 32bit psql and the 64bit one have the same name? >>> If so, where will they be installed? >> >> I'm only talking about libpq. I see no reason to have 32 & 64 bit >> versions of other utilities installed in parallel. > > Well what about the libraries (e.g openssl) libpq links? Yes, that is an issue as I noted earlier. We probably would still have to put the 32 bit and 64 bit libraries in a different directory because of their naming conventions. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: