On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Mickael Deloison <mdeloison@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/11 Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>:
>> I would expect an error message from the first query, and nicely
>> formatted errors from the second and third tests (though actually I
>> wouldn't expect an error at all from the docs example). FWIW, other
>> (non-erroring) examples work fine:
>
> Attached to this email, a patch that makes parsing error outputs nicer.
Yeah, that looks nicer - applied.
BTW, there's no need to tar.gz the patches unless they're over 100KB
or whatever the list limit is (and this list shouldn't auto-reject any
that are oversized like the other PG lists).
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com