On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Does that sound about right?
>
> We dumped the static library part, because that library would depend on
> pgadmin itself, and we'd either get duplicate symbols or a circular
> reference.
> (pgScript requires a few classes from pgAdmin to work)
>
> So we're back to linking directly with pgadmin.
Oh, OK - well I'm fine with that.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com