Re: stat() vs cygwin

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: stat() vs cygwin
Дата
Msg-id 937d27e10806240147v7e0c9f4fje8ca0a29b3a12646@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: stat() vs cygwin  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: stat() vs cygwin
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> As in the cygwin build does build. Nobody really has verified if the fix
> is needed there. But frankly, if you are likely to care about the
> effects of this issue, you won't be running cygwin anyway. It's mostly a
> dead platform for postgresql anyway, AFAICS we only keep it building for
> legacy compatibility. Once it starts taking lots of resources to keep
> building (which it doesn't now), I think we should just drop it instead...

FWIW, the most recent packages from Cygwin themselves are 8.2.5.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: stat() vs cygwin
Следующее
От: "Heikki Linnakangas"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes