On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I would like to move slony schemas under the Catalogs node instead of
> > the Schema node, since you're not meant to store "normal stuff" under
> > there.
> >
> > Any objections to this?
>
> Actually, let me rephrase that. Any objections *or approvals* of that? ;-)
Sounds sensible to me. They should probably have a sensible artificial
name (like the catalogs do) so it's obvious what they are.
/D