Re: Improving isolationtester's data output

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Nobody has complained about the removal of --dry-run with 13~.  The
> second one would cause tests to fail after a minor upgrade for
> extensions using isolationtester, but it seems like a good thing to
> inform people about anyway.  So, okay, both parts are done.

Thanks!

            regards, tom lane