Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chapman Flack
Тема Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero
Дата
Msg-id 934a095a-6a5c-5042-ae09-5694344cb283@anastigmatix.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero  (Matt Pulver <mpulver@unitytechgroup.com>)
Ответы Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero
Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero
Список pgsql-hackers
On 3/1/19 3:49 PM, Matt Pulver wrote:

> In many applications, I would much rather see calculations carried out
> via IEEE 754 all the way to the end, with nans and infs, which
> provides much more useful diagnostic information than an exception that
> doesn't return any rows at all. As Andres Freund pointed out, it is also
> more expensive to do the intermediate checks. Just let IEEE 754 do its
> thing! (More directed at the SQL standard than to PostgreSQL.)

I wanted to try this out a little before assuming it would work,
and there seems to be no trouble creating a trivial domain over
float8 (say, CREATE DOMAIN ieeedouble AS float8), and then creating
operators whose operand types are the domain type.

So it seems an extension could easily do that, and supply happily
inf-returning and NaN-returning versions of the operators and
functions, and those will be used whenever operands have the domain
type.

It might even be useful and relatively elegant, while leaving the
SQL-specified base types to have the SQL-specified behavior.

-Chap


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Drop type "smgr"?