Re: Minor fix in lwlock.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Minor fix in lwlock.c
Дата
Msg-id 9304.1112937642@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Minor fix in lwlock.c  ("Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>)
Список pgsql-patches
"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> I guess the problem is here:

>  /*
>   * Fix the process wait semaphore's count for any absorbed wakeups.
>   */
>  while (extraWaits-- > 0)
>   PGSemaphoreUnlock(&proc->sem);

Mmm.  Could be a problem, but the chances of having extraWaits>0 is
really pretty small.  In any case, FATAL doesn't fix this, because
it will still try to go through normal backend exit cleanup which
requires having working LWLock support.  If you take the above risk
seriously then you need a PANIC error.

The alternative would be to move the Unlock loop in front of the
addition of the LWLock to held_lwlocks[], but I think that cure
is probably worse than the disease --- the chance of an error during
Unlock seems nonzero.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Qingqing Zhou"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Minor fix in lwlock.c
Следующее
От: "Qingqing Zhou"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Minor fix in lwlock.c