Re: BUG #13979: Strange pg_stat_statements results with PREPARE/EXECUTE
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #13979: Strange pg_stat_statements results with PREPARE/EXECUTE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 929.1456241888@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #13979: Strange pg_stat_statements results with PREPARE/EXECUTE (Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #13979: Strange pg_stat_statements results with PREPARE/EXECUTE
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com> writes:
> So I expected following result after performing second time "SELECT *
> FROM tt WHERE c1 = $1" in a previous e-mail.
> =# SELECT queryid, calls, query FROM pg_stat_statements WHERE query LIKE
> '%tt%';
> queryid | calls | query
> -----------+-------+----------------------------------------------------
> 575935600 | 1| PREPARE p1(int) AS SELECT * FROM tt WHERE c1 = $1;
> other-queryid | 10 | SELECT * FROM tt WHERE c1 = $1;
> (2 row)
> But actually SELECT was counted as PREPARE in pg_stat_statements.
> That's what I thought strange.
What's in the query field is whatever source string the query was created
from. In the case of a prepared statement, we could potentially show
either the PREPARE or the EXECUTE, but the former was deemed much more
useful. There's no logic in there to invent a string that was never
actually submitted to the engine.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: