On 12/13/21 14:48, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:29:39PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> In your 0003 patch, the "if inh: break" isn't removed from examine_variable(),
>>> but the corresponding thing is removed everywhere else.
>>
>> Ah, you're right. And it wasn't updated in the 0002 patch either - it
>> should do the relkind check too, to allow partitioned tables. Fixed.
>
> I think you fixed it in 0002 (thanks) but still wasn't removed from 0003?
>
D'oh! Those repeated rebase conflicts got me quite confused.
> In these comments:
> + * When dealing with regular inheritance trees, ignore extended stats
> + * (which were built without data from child rels, and thus do not
> + * represent them). For partitioned tables data from partitions are
> + * in the stats (and there's no data in the non-leaf relations), so
> + * in this case we do consider extended stats.
>
> I suggest to add a comment after "For partitioned tables".
>
I've reworded the comment a bit, hopefully it's a bit clearer now.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company