Re: Incorrect estimates on columns
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Incorrect estimates on columns | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9262.1192646974@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Incorrect estimates on columns (Chris Kratz <chris.kratz@vistashare.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Incorrect estimates on columns | 
| Список | pgsql-performance | 
Chris Kratz <chris.kratz@vistashare.com> writes:
> I'm struggling to get postgres to run a particular query quickly.
The key problem seems to be the join size misestimate here:
>                ->  Hash Join  (cost=45.92..1251.07 rows=21 width=8) (actual time=0.948..10.439 rows=1199 loops=1)
>                      Hash Cond: (par.activity = a.activityid)
>                      ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on rpt_agencyquestioncache_171_0 par  (cost=21.92..1222.19 rows=1247
width=8)(actual time=0.415..3.081 rows=1199 loops=1) 
>                      ->  Hash  (cost=19.21..19.21 rows=383 width=4) (actual time=0.513..0.513 rows=383 loops=1)
Evidently it's not realizing that every row of par will have a join
partner, but why not?  I suppose a.activityid is unique, and in most
cases that I've seen the code seems to get that case right.
Would you show us the pg_stats rows for par.activity and a.activityid?
            regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: