Re: Lock compatibility matrix

"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:09 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same information?

> The lock information is not available anywhere in the form of a matrix.

Sure, but at this point we have proposals for adding two different matrix
representations, both redundant with the textual description.  I don't
mind adding one of the two, but both seems overkill.

            regards, tom lane