Re: LGPL
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: LGPL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9219.1119072376@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: LGPL ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: LGPL
Re: LGPL |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> With libreadline, we are not taking their code or distributing it, but
>> merely linking to it if it exists.
> But we are also requiring it. The rpms won't install unless readline is
> available.
The RPMs require it --- not our source code. Since the RPMs can only
work atop a GPL OS (Linux), it hardly matters in that context.
What is important is that it is possible, and useful, to build Postgres
in a completely non-GPL environment. If that were not so then I think
we'd have some license issues. But the fact that building PG in a
GPL-ized environment creates a GPL-ized binary is not a problem from my
point of view. You've already bought into the GPL if you're using that
environment.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: