Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9204.1564014879@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-07-25 12:20:58 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:06 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>>> Seems easiest to just add xid_current(), or add a cast from int8 to xid
>>> (probably explicit?) that handles the wraparound logic correctly?
>> Yeah, I was wondering about that. int8 isn't really the right type,
>> since FullTransactionId is unsigned.
> For now that doesn't seem that big an impediment...
Yeah, I would absolutely NOT recommend that you open that can of worms
right now. We have looked at adding unsigned integer types in the past
and it looked like a mess.
I think an explicit cast is a reasonable thing to add, though.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: