Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan
Дата
Msg-id 91bd52e8-87be-cfe0-77e7-892f0d78038d@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 23.01.18 17:08, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> attached updated patch

This appears to be the patch of record in this thread.  I think there is
general desire for adding a setting like this, and the implementation is
simple enough.

One change perhaps: How about naming the default setting "auto" instead
of "default".  That makes it clearer what it does.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Andrey V. Lepikhov"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Timestamp for a XLOG_BACKUP_END WAL-record
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Costing bug in hash join logic for semi joins