Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Дата
Msg-id 916.1033012810@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> ... Now, we just have the GUC value which does
> propogate like the global one did.  Does the postmaster still pass -dX
> down to the child like it used to?

Evidently not; else Patrick wouldn't be complaining that it doesn't
work like it used to.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel