Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 911898.1739823180@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote: > I suspect that the attached will fix it. What I don't understand > is why it's apparently so hard to trigger the crash, because it > looks to me like any two successive insert commands on the same > BRIN index should hit this. Oh, wait: I was confusing ii_AmCache with rd_amcache in the index's relcache entry. This coding would absolutely not work with rd_amcache since that's persistent. It mostly works with the IndexInfo field though, since an IndexInfo typically only survives per-query. Evidently there's some path in logical replication that will re-use an IndexInfo across multiple distinct insertion operations, and that's what breaks it. > BTW, I'm also a bit suspicious of the comment's claim that the > brinDesc doesn't need cleanup. That looks like a potential > memory leak. This concern still stands. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: