Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots
Дата
Msg-id 9112.1174849783@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> That's not really the point. The problem is that the compiler usually can't
> deduce which function you're calling or even which set of functions you might
> be calling. So, for example, the compiler will have trouble determining which
> variables may be untouched over the function call and thus not have to be
> reloaded into registers.

Well, since the functions in question are in a separate module from
their callers, I think it highly unlikely that any such optimizations
would be applied in practice anyway.

> Again though, I really don't think it matters.

Agreed, it's unlikely this would be a significant change either way.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots
Следующее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: datestyle GUC broken in HEAD?