On 9/5/07, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > > Right, additionally NTFS is really nothing to use on any serious disc
> > > array.
> >
> > Do you mean that I will not see any big improvement if I upgrade the disk
> > subsystem because the client is using NTFS (i.e. Windows)
>
> No, I think he's referring more to the lack of reliability of NTFS
> compared to UFS / ZFS / JFS / XFS on unixen.
Lack of reliability compared to _UFS_? Can you elaborate on this?