Re: Slow system due to ReorderBufferGetTupleBuf?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martin Moore
Тема Re: Slow system due to ReorderBufferGetTupleBuf?
Дата
Msg-id 9097DCB4-E742-46A9-B72D-D902598CD1FC@avbrief.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Slow system due to ReorderBufferGetTupleBuf?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: Slow system due to ReorderBufferGetTupleBuf?  (Martin Moore <martin.moore@avbrief.com>)
Список pgsql-general

On 01/01/2018, 17:45, "Peter Geoghegan" <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:

    On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Martin Moore <martin.moore@avbrief.com> wrote:
    > Can someone shed some light on this and advise how to prevent it reoccurring?

    You're using v10, which has these two commits:

    https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=58b25e98106dbe062cec0f3d31d64977bffaa4af

    https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=9fab40ad32efa4038d19eaed975bb4c1713ccbc0

    Unfortunately, per the commit message of the first commit, it doesn't
    look like the tuple allocator uses any new strategy, at least until
    this v11 commit:

    https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=a4ccc1cef5a04cc054af83bc4582a045d5232cb3

    My guess is that that would make a noticeable difference, once v11
    becomes available. Could you test this yourself by building from the
    master branch?

    --
    Peter Geoghegan





Thanks Peter. I don’t really want to go down that route for various reasons. There’s a task that copies ‘old’ rows to
variousold_  tables and then deletes from the main tables, then does a vaccum and analyse. Tables only have 20-30k
rows.I’m guessing this may be the trigger for the problem so have changed the timing from every 20 mins to once in the
middleof the night when things are quiet. 

Would this explain the problem?


Martin.







В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PGPool encrypted connections from Application
Следующее
От: Durumdara
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Select for update / deadlock possibility?