Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
>> Making the user fix it seems much more sensible to me. Otherwise I
>> suspect we'll find users who get strangely surprised when they can
>> no longer find any trace of an expected index in their upgraded
>> database.
> Or preserve it as-is.
To do that, we would have to add an option to CREATE INDEX to create it
in an invalid state. Which is stupid...
regards, tom lane