Re: CVS HEAD compile warning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: CVS HEAD compile warning
Дата
Msg-id 9065.1077770763@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CVS HEAD compile warning  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Ответы Re: CVS HEAD compile warning  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> That's interesting, because I get no such warning here.  What version
>> of flex are you using?  (Mine is 2.5.4)

> [nconway@tokyo:/home/nconway]% flex --version
> flex 2.5.31

Oh, that thing.  We deliberately backed off of 2.5.31 some time ago
because it seemed too broken to be worth our time; see for instance
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-04/msg00732.php
(searching the archives for "2.5.31" turns up various other interesting
comments).

Peter claimed some time later that he'd fixed CVS tip to work with
2.5.31, but I'm still not willing to put any effort into it.  IMHO
the burden of proof is on 2.5.31 to prove that it's not broken.

Red Hat's still shipping 2.5.4a according to a quick look...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Philip Warner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bgwriter never dies
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bgwriter never dies