"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> As with most things there is always room for improvement. In this case,
> though, I'm not seeing anything wrong with the direct wording provided.
Also, it's under a heading that says "The following command-line options
control the location and format of the output", which ought to make it
clear that it's not about the source server's WAL dir. (Although I notice
that whoever added the --max-rate parameter didn't read that heading :-()
Still, I see that the main -D parameter is described as "Directory to
write the output to", which seems like a clearer phrasing, so I'm inclined
to similarly reword the description of --waldir.
A more direct criticism of the --waldir description is that it's not
stated what happens if you don't provide that argument.
I notice some shaky grammar and other minor annoyances in this page,
so I'm kind of inclined to make an editorial pass over the whole thing.
regards, tom lane