On Jan 13, 2008 9:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Warren Turkal" <turkal@google.com> writes:
> > I have a question. Are the low level representations of Timestamp and
> > TimestampTZ the same?
>
> They're the same but the interpretations are different, which is why
> I think it's useful to have two typedefs as a way of documenting what
> any given value is intended to be. The argument for having a third
> typedef would be exactly the same: to help document what a value is
> intended to be.
Makes sense.
wt