On 06.06.23 03:21, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 12:56 PM Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org> wrote:
>> postgres=# select collversion,count(*) from pg_collation group by
>> collversion;
>> collversion | count
>> ---------------+-------
>> | 5
>> 1539.5,1539.5 | 1457
>> (2 rows)
>>
>> According to [1] the second number is obsolete, and AFAICS we should
>> expose only the first.
>
> Would it be a good idea to remove or ignore the trailing /,*$/
> somewhere, perhaps during pg_upgrade, to avoid bogus version mismatch
> warnings?
I wonder whether it's worth dealing with this, versus just leaving it
all alone.