Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 progress
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 progress |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8bda40459fc8fe6f7eef57556b039f1f обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [HACKERS] 6.1 progress (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Oh the pressure :)...Anyways, PSQL has a huge leak (90% reported by > Purify, whatever that means :) ) in reading in external sql files (through > -f option)...this might be contributing to recent reports of memory leaks > during regression tests (aside from the backend which is another issue)... > > I am working on it right now, but I don't think PSQL issue is important > enough to delay the release....if everything checks out allright by Friday > then we should release it...Then starting with 6.2 make sure we eliminate > as many memory problems as possible.... > > Oh well, just a thought.... > > BTW...I will be out of town next week, then when I come back it's Jury > duty...so I'll try to finish psql/libpq by this week anyway.... OK, let's see where we are at the end of the week. Take it as far as you can. I am curious what you see in the backend. People are reporting more memory problems than in 6.1. It may be psql, or libpq, or it may be a few things that we added to the backend that are causing problems. When people are running the regression tests multiple times and seeing errors, how are you doing that? Doesn't the backend and psql restart on every iteration? Is it the postmaster that is growing too big? - -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us ------------------------------
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: