Re: Vacuum statistics
От | Alena Rybakina |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum statistics |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8b2f3c20-02ac-4658-b78f-e9d7590f893b@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum statistics (Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi!
On 08.10.2024 19:18, Alena Rybakina wrote:Made a rebase on a fresh master branch.
-- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres ProfessionalThank you for rebasing.
I have noticed that when I create a table or an index on this table, there is no information about the table or index in pg_stat_vacuum_tables and pg_stat_vacuum_indexes until we perform a VACUUM.
Example:
CREATE TABLE t (i INT, j INT);
INSERT INTO t SELECT i/10, i/100 FROM GENERATE_SERIES(1,1000000) i;
SELECT * FROM pg_stat_vacuum_tables WHERE relname = 't';
....
(0 rows)
CREATE INDEX ON t (i);
SELECT * FROM pg_stat_vacuum_indexes WHERE relname = 't_i_idx';
...
(0 rows)I can see the entries after running VACUUM or executing autovacuum. or when autovacuum is executed. I would suggest adding a line about the relation even if it has not yet been processed by vacuum. Interestingly, this issue does not occur with pg_stat_vacuum_database:
CREATE DATABASE example_db;
SELECT * FROM pg_stat_vacuum_database WHERE dbname = 'example_db';
dboid | dbname | ...
... | example_db | ...
(1 row)
BTW, I recommend renaming the view pg_stat_vacuum_database to pg_stat_vacuum_databaseS for consistency with pg_stat_vacuum_tables and pg_stat_vacuum_indexes
Thanks for the review. I'm investigating this. I agree with the renaming, I will do it in the next version of the patch.
-- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: