Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8a8c60b4-39c0-69a4-824c-e364f5fd97ea@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/24/2017 02:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 02/24/2017 11:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I don't know what to call it either. In my test I used
>>> CallerContextFunctionCall2 - not sure if that's quite right, but should
>>> be close.
>> CallerInfo? CallerFInfo? Or we could spell out CallerFmgrInfo but
>> that seems a bit verbose.
>>
>>
> I'll go with CallerFInfoFunctionCall2 etc.
>
> In the btree_gist system the calls to the routines like enum_cmp are
> buried about three levels deep. I'm thinking I'll just pass the flinfo
> down the stack and just call these routines at the bottom level.
>
>
>
It's occurred to me that we could reduce the code clutter in fmgr.c a
bit by turning the DirectFunctionCall{n]Coll functions into macros
calling these functions and passing NULL as the flinfo param.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: