Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
| От | Jeff Davis | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()? | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8a1c93b33b6e0aac92b771339cce520eac0adf96.camel@j-davis.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()? (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 07:00 +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> It looks like the buffer is not dirty in the problematic call.
Thank you for the report! I was able to reproduce and observe that the
buffer is not marked dirty.
The call (hashovfl.c:671):
  XLogRegisterBuffer(1, wbuf, REGBUF_STANDARD)
is followed unconditionally by:
  PageSetLSN(BufferGetPage(wbuf), recptr)
so if the Assert were not there, it would be setting the LSN on a page
that's not marked dirty. Therefore I think this is a bug, or at least
an interesting/unexpected case.
Perhaps the registration and the PageSetLSN don't need to happen when
nitups==0?
Regards,
    Jeff Davis
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: