Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6
| От | Yogesh Sharma |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8F86F8F397DDD345B25EA2EF3E21648299B37DF9@EXCH-MB03-U2.nectechnologies.in обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6 ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6
(Jan de Visser <jan@de-visser.net>)
Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6 ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Dear David sir/All,
Thanks for your help.
Just wanted to confirm few things.
(9.3.5,9.2.9,9.1.14,9.0.18,8.4.22) Fix REASSIGN OWNED to not fail for text search objects (Álvaro Herrera)
As per my understanding from what you told the fix was done in 9.3.5 and then back patched to all the remaining version mentioned above.
My concern is why it was back patched to these particular version only.
Also will these feature be available only in these particular version and above 9.3.5 version or is it available in all the version above 8.4.22
This is not about this particular patch, I want to understand the multiple version number which are mentioned before several patch at given link.
https://bucardo.org/postgres_all_versions.html
Please let me know what yours thought onto this.
Regards,
Yogesh
From: David G. Johnston [mailto:david.g.johnston@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:18 PM
To: Albe Laurenz
Cc: Yogesh Sharma; Adrian Klaver; Moreno Andreo; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
Yogesh Sharma wrote:
> I have doubt regarding release notes of all versions.
> As per release notes, below change logs are mentioned in all versions.
>
> "(8.3.8,8.4.1,8.2.14) Make LOAD of an already-loaded loadable module into a no-op (Tom Lane)"
> 1. What is meaning of above lines?
> 2. This changes are implemented only in above versions or is it propagated on every above newer
> versions after that?
> 3. Why same line is mentioned in the release notes of above 8.3.8,8.4.1,8.2.14 versions?
Ad 1:
As of the cited versions, nothing will be done if you use LOAD to load a module
that is already loaded.
Ad 2:
The change was a bugfix that was applied to the development version (so it is included
in 9.0 and later) and was backpatched to 8.2, 8.3 and 8.4.
Just to be totally clear on this point.
8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 are all Major releases of the PostgreSQL product. For most other products it would as if the numbering went from "15, to 16, to 17". The last 8.x release was 8.4 (so, there were 5 major releases that all shared the same prefix value of 8) and the 9.x series goes from 9.0 to 9.6 (presently in beta). Instead of 9.7 we will be going to 10.0 AND at the same time modernizing our numbering scheme to lose the prefix-suffix components. IOW, after 10.0 the next major release will be 11.0. The .0 will increment for minor releases in which we only apply bug-fixes. There will no longer be a third number.
The rest of Albe's comments apply and are largely driven by this structure. Each major-release is considered stand-alone and so if the same basic change is made to more than one major release all of them will have it documented. But only the initial introduction or application of the change is documented - any subsequent major or minor release has that behavior unless a new release note indicates that said behavior changed again.
David J.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:
Следующее
От: Durgamahesh ManneДата:
Сообщение: Re: regarding schema only migration from sqlserver to postgres with runmtk.sh