RE: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from out-of -dis k-sp ace

> The reason I'm inclined to question this is that what we want 
> is not an fsync per write but an fsync per transaction, and we can't 
> easily buffer all of a transaction's XLOG writes...

WAL keeps records in WAL buffers (wal-buffers parameter may be used to
increase # of buffers), so we can make write()-s buffered.

Seems that my Solaris has fdatasync, so I'll test different approaches...

Vadim